Patna High CourtCWJC/9424/2017disposed

Priyadarshi Harshvardhan v. The Govt. Of India Through Secretary, President Secretariat And ORS

2017-08-01The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9424 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Priyadarshi Harshvardhan, Son of Sri Arun Prakash Srivastava, Near Ganesh Mandir, Ramdihara, P.O. Ramdihara, P.S. Amjhor, District- Rohtas, Bihar821312. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Govt. of India through Secretary, President Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2. Secretary, Prime Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

3. Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

4. Chairman, Niti Ayog, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

5. Secretary, Speaker of Member of Parliament, New Delhi. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D Sanjay (ADDL. SOC. GEN.) =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 01-08 -2017 Petitioner wants a report or recommendation of the High Power Commission for granting the status of Industry to the agriculture of the nation to be implemented. The question whether report and recommendation made by such a Commission should be implemented or not is a matter of policy, executive in nature, to be taken up and decided by the executive authorities and a mandamus for the same cannot be issued by this Court.

If the petitioner has any grievance, he shall have liberty to take up the issues with the executive authorities of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.9424 of 2017 dt.01-08-2017 2/2 Government or the legislative authorities and it would be for them to consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. Finding no ground for indulgence exercising extra ordinary jurisdiction in the matter under Article 226 of the Constitution, the application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 5.8.2017 Transmission Date N/A