← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70812/2025dismissed

Farookh Miyan @ Farookh Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-08Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70812 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2025 Thana- CHOUTARWA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Farookh Miyan @ Farookh Ansari S/O Hanif Miyan @ Habib Miyan R/O Vill.- Mishrauli, Tola- Patilar, Ward no. 14, P.S.- Chaturwa, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Urmila Devi @ Vimal Devi W/O Sri Bhimal Sharma R/O Vill.- Mishrauli, Tola- Patilar, P.S.- Chaturwa, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharad Kumar Verma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Chautarwa P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 65(2) of the BNS and Sections 4/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (For brevity, POCSO Act).

3. According to allegation, the petitioner, after confining 10 years girl of the informant, committed rape upon her in his house. The door of the petitioner's house was forcibly opened and he was found in objectionable position.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70812 of 2025(3) dt.08-01-2026 2/2

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He is a neighbour and due to enmity, he has been implicated. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and has been in custody since 08.06.2025.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the victim is a minor girl of 10 years. She narrated the entire occurrence in the statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. The medical report shows that hymen was ruptured and injury to her private part was present.

6. In my view, the petitioners doesn't deserve the privileges of bail, which is hereby rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T