Ramesh Paswan @ Sidharth v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33550 of 2017 (4) dt.20-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33550 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -197 Year- 2013 Thana -LALGANJ District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Ramesh Paswan @ Sidharth, son of Sri Nagina Paswan, resident of village - Bhatauliya, Police Station - Paroo, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 197 of 2013, registered under Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, Section13 of the U.A.P. Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 24.06.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18295 of 2014 by this Court. Further submission is that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., but in course of investigation, his name has surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and police got recorded his confessional statement in connection with Deoria P.S.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33550 of 2017 (4) dt.20-09-2017 Case No. 90 of 2013, thereafter he remanded in the present case on 17.03.2017.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 197 of 2013. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T