Bhushan Tiwari @ Prem Bhushan Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71654 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2025 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Bhushan Tiwari @ Prem Bhushan Tiwari S/O late Shivshankar Tiwari R/O Vill.- Purshotam Pur, P.S.- Majhauliya, Dist.- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gaurav Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 349/2025 dated 12.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 103(1), 238 read with 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and creamated her dead body for disappearing the evidence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71654 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner who is the father-in-law of the deceased. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. It is submitted that the deceased was not subjected to torture and cruelty soon before her death for or in connection with demand of dowry. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 349/2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T