← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76512/2024dismissed

Ambuj Kumar @ Ambooj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-19Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76512 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2024 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ambuj Kumar @ Ambooj Kumar Son of Late Nawal Kishore Singh Resident of Village - Hakam, P.S. - Mohammadpur, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Shrivastava, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No.208 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable u/s 409 and 420 of the IPC. 3.

Allegedly, one Mukesh Kumar Singh, then Assistant (Patna IT) is said to have made illegal transfer of Rs.33,90,000/- with the connivance of the petitioner and one Aditya Kumar. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever taken place. The specific allegation to withdraw the said amount is against the co-accused Mukesh Kumar Singh and there is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76512 of 2024(2) dt.19-11-2024 2/2 specific allegation against the petitioner. There is no role of the petitioner in the alleged transaction. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

8.

However, petitioner is at liberty to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T