Bikau Mahto And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29325 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2013 Thana -BARGANIA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Bikau Mahto, S/o Late Badri Mahto,

2. Bipati Devi @ Most Bipati Devi, W/o Late Badri Mahto,

3. Savita Devi @ Sarita Devi, W/o Bikau Mahto, All R/o Vill.- Masaha Navrotam , P.S.- Bairginiya, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bairginia P.S. Case No. 156 of 2013, instituted for the offence under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are brother-in-law, mother-in-law and Gotni of the deceased. The husband of the deceased is already in custody. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Bairginia P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29325 of 2018 (3) dt.28-06-2018 2/2 156 of 2013, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi at Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.

U T