Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4609 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2018 Thana- LAKHNAUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

RANJEET KUMAR SINGH @ RANJEET SINGH Son of Sri Sitaram Singh Resident of Village - Kachhuvi, P.S.- Lakhnour, P.O.- Kachhuvi, Distt.- Madhubani.

2.

Radha Raman Singh Son of Sri Ranjeet Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Kachhuvi, P.S.- Lakhnour, P.O.- Kachhuvi, Distt.- Madhubani. 3.

Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Singh Son of Sri Ranjeet Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Kachhuvi, P.S.- Lakhnour, P.O.- Kachhuvi, Distt.- Madhubani.

4.

Vandan Prasad Singh Son of Late Jeevachh Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Kachhuvi, P.S.- Lakhnour, P.O.- Kachhuvi, Distt.- Madhubani. 5.

Abdhesh Kumar Singh @ Abdhesh Singh @ Abdhesh Son of Vandan Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Kachhuvi, P.S.- Lakhnour, P.O.- Kachhuvi, Distt.- Madhubani.

6.

Dilip Kumar Singh @ Dilip Singh Son of Sri Sitaram Singh Resident of Village - Kachhuvi, P.S.- Lakhnour, P.O.- Kachhuvi, Distt.- Madhubani. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2020 The appellants seek pre arrest bail in connection with Lakhnour P.S.Case No.234 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 324, 354B, 479 an d 504 Indian Penal Code and section 3(i)(r)(s)/2(Va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

As per FIR, appellants and other accused persons entered inside the house of the informant and assaulted the

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4609 of 2019(3) dt.06-01-2020 2/2 informant & her husband as well as the son of the informant and also disrobed the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is that there is case and counter case between the parties and the appellants were given benefit of Section 41(i) of the Cr.P.C. but later on charge sheet has been submitted and the cognizance has been taken. There is land dispute between the parties also, which will appear from the FIR.

Heard learned Special P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of submissions as discussed above, this application is disposed of with direction to the appellants to surrender and pray for regular bail, which will be considered on its own merit and if possible to be disposed of on the same day.

With the above observation, this appeal is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T