Rajesh Ranjan @ Tunna Kumar Singh @ Rajesh Ranjan @ Tunna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4304 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2019 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

RAJESH RANJAN @ TUNNA KUMAR SINGH @ RAJESH RANJAN @ TUNNA SINGH Son of Vijay Singh Resident of Village- Chandi, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, District- Vaishali.

2.

Kanhai Kumar @ Kumar Shaurav Son of Umesh Singh Resident of VillageChandi, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, District- Vaishali. 3.

Chandan Kumar Singh @ Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Singh @ Chandan Singh Son of Vijay Singh Resident of Village- Chandi, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, District- Vaishali.

4.

Gunjan Singh @ Ujjwal Kumar @ Gunjan Son of Vijay Singh Resident of Village- Chandi, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 16-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Spl. PP for the State.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of prayer of anticipatory bail vide order dated 27.08.2019 passed by learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 296 of 2019 registered under Sections 147, 178, 149, 341, 323, 324, 333, 337, 353, 354, 307, 379, 504, 506 of

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4304 of 2019(2) dt.16-10-2019 2/3 the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 49 named accused persons including the appellants and 80-90 unknown miscreants are said to have blocked Lalganj Hajipur main road. When the informant along with police posse arrived there and tried to lift the blockade, they assaulted by means of lathi making the informant and two other police personnel injured. They also slated the Chowkidar in the name of his caste and tried to snatch their arms.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants have no concern with the aforesaid occurrence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. Utmost, the appellants happen to be member of the mob. Allegation levelled against the appellants is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Victim has sustained simple injury in the occurrence. Chowkidar Laldeo Paswan appearing before the learned lower court and by filing petition, has denied his presence at the place of occurrence at the time of occurrence. Several co-accused persons have been enlarged on anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 17.09.2019 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 3938 of 2019.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4304 of 2019(2) dt.16-10-2019 3/3 Learned Spl. PP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named appellants be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Hajipur, Vaishali in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 296 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) mantreshwar/- U T