Shankar Yadav @ Prabhat Shankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74519 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2025 Thana- DEEPNAGAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

Shankar Yadav @ Prabhat Shankar Kumar Son of Naresh Prasad @ Naresh Yadav R/o Village - Korai, P.S. - Deepnagar, District - Nalanda. 2.

Shambhu Yadav Son of Late Umesh Yadav R/o Village - Korai, P.S. - Deepnagar, Dist. - Nalanda.

3.

Rakesh Kumar Son of Rambaran Yadav @ Rambaran Prasad R/o Village - Korai, P.S. - Deepnagar, Dist. - Nalanda.

4.

Dharmendra Yadav Son of Naresh Prasad @ Naresh Yadav R/o Village - Korai, P.S. - Deepnagar, Dist. - Nalanda.

5.

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Yadav Son of Naresh Prasad @ Naresh Yadav R/o Village - Korai, P.S. - Deepnagar, Dist. - Nalanda. 6.

Nitish Kumar Son of Rambaran Yadav @ Rambaran Prasad R/o Village - Korai, P.S. - Deepnagar, Dist. - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mrs. Renuka Ratnakar, (APP 125) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 20-02-2026 Heard Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP representing the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 272 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of the Arms Act, lodged on 26.06.2025 by the informant Sushila Devi.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74519 of 2025(3) dt.20-02-2026 2/2

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that her husband is no more and for the livelihood she used to do agriculture work. As she was feeding her cattle, the accused persons came and after abuse, resorted to indiscriminate firing. Next day, she found her cattle in an injured condition and took them to Animal Hospital for treatment. This led to the F.I.R..

4. Though learned counsel for the petitioners tried to impress upon this Court regarding their innocence, learned APP has taken this Court to paragraph no.3 of the petition to show that some of the petitioners have criminal antecedent.

5. The allegation of indiscriminate firing is there and the injury of the cattle clearly show the case to be true. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, no relief can be extended to the petitioners.

6. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T