Sultan Quraeshi @ Md. Sultan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65399 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2018 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sultan Quraeshi @ Md. Sultan, Son of Rahman Quraeshi Resident of VillageKopa, Ward No. 12, P.S. Sindhara, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No.238 of 2018, for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 151, 341, 342, 337, 307 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 11(A)(e) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 2016 and Section 47, 48, 49/51(i), 52, 54(i)(ii), 56(i)(ii) of Transportation Cattle Rules, 1978. Prosecution story is that FIR named accused persons along with 10 to 15 unknown persons were carrying cattle in a pick up van which was intercepted by the police then the FIR named accused along with other unknown accused persons started pelting stones with a view to create hindrance in the official duty of the Government personnel.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65399 of 2019(2) dt.06-11-2019 2/2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Learned counsel further submits that persons who are named in the FIR have been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No.39660 of 2019 and Cr. Misc. No.79992 of 2018.

After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and taking into consideration the fact that persons named in the FIR have been granted bail by this Court, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of surrender by him, he shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Court below upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, subject to the condition as mentioned under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U T