← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73166/2023dismissed

Akhilesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-09Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73166 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2022 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH SON OF RAMESHWAR SINGH @ NITHALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KHARAON, PS- SAHAR, DISTBHOJPUR AT ARA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 190 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act.

3. As per allegation, the informant, having got a secret information, intercepted a motorcycle wherefrom 10 kg of ganja was recovered. The co-accused person disclosed his name as Sitaram Sah.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that 10 kg of ganja was recovered from co-accused and he has named this petitioner. The alleged ganja was though much more to the small quantity but lesser than commercial quantity. He has submitted further that co-accused, due to animosity with the petitioner, has implicated him in this case in his self-inculpatory statement. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73166 of 2023(2) dt.09-11-2023 2/2 also submitted that co-accused Sitaram Sah, who was arrested, has been granted bail by the learned court below. 5.

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and makes a prayer for regular bail, which shall be disposed of without being prejudiced by this order.

6. In my view, the petitioner does not deserve the privileges for bail, which is hereby rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Kundan/- U T