Sushil Thakur And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28345 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -318 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAUSA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Sushil Thakur, S/o Late Sita Ram Thakur,

2. Ashok Thakur,

3. Bikash Thakur Both Sons of Late Bishundeo @ Bishnu Thakur, All R/o Vill.- Lauwalagan, P.S.- Chousa, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 318 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 325, 427, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners and others is of assault to the informant and his family members.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners and though there is allegation of assault, however, the injuries were found to be simple in nature.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28345 of 2018 (2) dt.17-05-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Udaishunganj, Madhepura, in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 318 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T