Sikandar Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65753 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1155 Year-2012 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== SIKANDAR ANSARI Son of Sukurulla Ansari Resident of Village - Mahapoli, P.S.- Taluka (Bhimandi), Distt - Thane (Maharashtra). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Soni Bibi Wife of Sikandar Ansari Resident of Village - Mahapoli, P.S.- Taluka (Bhimandi), Distt - Thane (Maharashtra). At present - resident of village - Miriyan, P.S.- Sonhan, Distt - Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Parwej Khan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Complaint Case No. 1155 of 2012, disclosing offences under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner happens to be husband of the complainant and allegation against him is of subjecting the complainant to torture with respect of demand of dowry.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and he is still ready to keep the complainant.
Heard learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the complainant. They have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that in this proclamation has already been done
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65753 of 2019(2) dt.22-10-2019 2/2 against the petitioner under Section 82 Cr.P.C., as the case is of the year 2012. Further submission of learned counsel for the complainant is that she is not ready to reside with the petitioner, as the petitioner has solemnized second marriage. Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather petitioner may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below will dispose of the same on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by this order.
This application is, accordingly, dismissed (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T