Dhananjay Kumar @ Bobby v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55392 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -251 Year- 2016 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================
1. Dhananjay Kumar @ Bobby, son of Sri Nathun Singh, resident of Village- Palanga, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Smt. Puspa Kumari, daughter of Late Bhukhlu Singh, resident of Mohalla- Rajapur Mainpura, P.S. Patliputra, District- Patna. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 323, 504, 506, 406, 379, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act.
The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55392 of 2017 (2) dt.23-11-2017 2/2 is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the State and counsel for the O.P. No.2 it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No.251C/2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T