Milan Sao @ Vinay Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30331 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2018 Thana -SASARAM RPF/POST District- GAYA ====================================================== Milan Sao @ Vinay Kumar Gupta S/o Phekan Sao, R/o Vill. + P.S.- Shivsagar, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party : Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in RPF Post/Sasaram Case No. 01 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section-3 R.P. (U.P.) Act.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that he was not apprehended on spot. One Chhotan Mushahar was arrested by the police while loading the coal on truck and he disclosed the name of this petitioner. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has got clean antecedent.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30331 of 2018 (3) dt.16-07-2018 of the like amount each in connection with in RPF Post/Sasaram Case No. 01 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway, Gaya subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T