Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nut @ Tammana Nat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71136 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-356 Year-2024 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nut @ Tammana Nat S/O Basant Nat Resident of VillageBangra, Police Station- Daudpur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Mili Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 356 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 09.04.2024 at about 9 A.M., while the informant was going to Chapra, six unknown persons on three motorcycles intercepted him near Raje Chowk, assaulted him at gunpoint, and looted his valuables including gold ornaments, mobile phones, cash, and documents before fleeing from the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71136 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/3 Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Hridaya Nut. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 22.03.2025 and has ten criminal antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 356 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71136 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T