Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67698 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2017 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== PRAMOD KUMAR @ PRAMOD KUMAR MANDAL Son of Nand Kumar Mandal Resident of Rewta, Gopalpur, P.S.- Chanan, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-10-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/40 of the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rule 1972 and Section 8 (d) of Bihar Minerals (Prevention of Illegl Mining Transporting and Storage Act. As per F.I.R. informant along with police party intercepted one tractor loaded with tractor. Petitioner happens to be driver of the tractor.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that owner of the tractor has already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 18.12.2018 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 75470 of 2018 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67698 of 2019(2) dt.24-10-2019 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the above submission, this application allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-III Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No.-15 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) T.Kr./- U T