Raju Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32752 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -213 Year- 2017 Thana -SARAI RANJAN District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Raju Rai, S/o Late Lakhpati Rai,

2. Kali Charan Rai S/o Late Lakhpati Rai, All R/o Vill.- Rasalpur, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rishikesh Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umeshnand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and leaned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 213 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 325, 354(B), 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner No. 1 is of thrashing the informant on the ground and tearing her blouse and against the petitioner No. 2 is of assault and made a construction of hut on the land of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the title suit No. 111 of 2017 is going with respect to the land dispute between them and there is general and omnibus allegation

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32752 of 2018 (2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 against all the petitioners.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer of bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 213 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/Priyanka/- U T