← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3283/2017disposed

Madhulata Sinha v. The State Of Bihar Through The Sri Rahul Singh, Joint Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. Of Bihar

2018-06-20The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3283 of 2017 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1689 of 2013 ====================================================== Madhulata Sinha, Wife of Late Ramchandra Singh, resident of Village Chandpur, PO Ekchari, PS Sanhola (Amdanda), District Bhagalpur, at present residing at Mohalla Krishnagarh, PS Sultanganj, District Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Rahul Singh, Joint Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. Sri Rahul Singh, Joint Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Chittranjan Singh, The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. Sri Phool Babu Choudhary, The District Education Officer, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur

5. Sri Manish Kumar, The District Treasury Officer, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur

6. Sri Binay Kumar, The General Manager, State Bank of India, Main Branch, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur

7. Sri Rajesh Jha, The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Sultanganj Branch, District Bhagalpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - AAG 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-06-2018 From the show cause filed by the respondents and the chart annexed thereto along with Annexure-A the communication made to the Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Sultanganj Branch, Bhagalpur, it is seen that the amount of benefit had been granted and deposited into the account of the petitioner.

Patna High Court MJC No.3283 of 2017(4) dt.20-06-2018 2/2 That being so, now no action is required to be taken. In case the grievance of the petitioner still subsists with regard to the manner in which the claim has been settled she will have the liberty to assail the same afresh in accordance with law. With the aforesaid this application stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Sudhir Singh, J) mrl./- U