← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17197/2017disposed

Rajendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-15Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17197 of 2017 ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad, son of Late Murhu, Resident of Mohalla- Chhoti Takya, P.O. + P.S. Chainpur, District- Kaimur, Bhabhua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna

4. The District Education Officer, Kaimur, Bhabhua ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate For the State :

Mr.Nishant Kumar Jha, AC to SC28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 15-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

So far as the claim for compassionate appointment is concerned, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application to explore departmental remedy, if available.

With the aforesaid, so far as the claim for compassionate appointment, the writ petition is dismissed.

So far as the claim for payment of other claim on account of decision of the State Government for regularization/absorption of the services of the mother of the petitioner, namely, Sukhdei Devi is concerned, the petitioner is

Patna High Court CWJC No.17197 of 2017(2) dt.15-12-2017 2/2 at liberty to agitate the matter before the respondent No. 4 who shall examine the claim of the petitioner with regard to monetary dues on account of regularization/absorption of the mother of the petitioner in the project school. In case such representation is filed, the respondent No. 4, District Education Officer, Kaimur will take a final decision on such representation in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, so far as the claim of monetary benefit of the mother of the petitioner is concerned, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U