Najkti @ Naj Parween And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37279 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1946 Year-2011 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ======================================================

1. Najkti @ Naj Parween, W/o Md. Feku,

2. Md. Feku @ Md. Samshe Alam @ Md. Feku Alam, S/o Late Mahtab,

3. Md. Rehan S/o Md. Feku All are R/o Mohalla- Samir Takia, P.S.- Civil Lines, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Nazni Khatoon W/o Md. Sagar, R/o Mohalla- Samir Tekia, P.S.- Civil Lines, District- Gaya.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Veer, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajkishore Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No.1946 of 2011, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 325, 354 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation has been made against the petitioners that they have entered into the house of the complainant and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37279 of 2018(2) dt.04-07-2018 2/3 petitioner nos. 2 and 3 tried to outrage her modesty. Allegation has been made against the petitioner no.1 to have taken away the money.

Considering the nature of allegation as also the fact that petitioner no.1 is a lady, let the petitioner no.1, namely, Najkti @ Naj Parween, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M.-I, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No.1946 of 2011, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioner no.1 for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, she will remain present for the investigation.

In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled. So far the bail of petitioner nos. 2 and 3 is concerned, the same is rejected. However, if the petitioner nos.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37279 of 2018(2) dt.04-07-2018 3/3 and pass appropriate order without being influenced by the order of this Court.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T