Raunak Kumar @ Fuchu @ Chuchu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70400 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM RAIL P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== Raunak Kumar @ Fuchu @ Chuchu Son of Umesh Chaudhary Resident of Village- Dosama Ketaki, P.S.- Dev, District- Aurangabad at present residing at Mohalla- Sangam Chowk, Badki Delha, Ward No 3, P.S.- Delha, DistrictGaya, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the allegation in the FIR, on 30.08.2025 during patrolling duty at platform No.3at Sasaram Railway Station, the RPF searched the train and during course of search the police party found total 127.845 litres of illicit foreign liquor of different brands from the bags kept near the bathroom of the third general coach from the engine and on suspicion the police party caught the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner has no concern with the alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70400 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 recovered liquor and there is no independent eye witness of the seizure list. He next submits that petitioner came to Gaya from Delhi in the said train and he went to natural call to the bathroom and in the meantime the police party reached there and recovered the alleged liquor near the bathroom and arrested the petitioner without any fault. He next submits that petitioner is in judicial custody since 01.09.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the above facts of the case and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise, Court No.2, Gaya in connection with Rail Sasaram P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T