Manoranjan Kumar Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72060 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-755 Year-2022 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Manoranjan Kumar Ranjan S/O Indradev Prasad Yadav @ Indu Dev Yadav Resident of Village -Gordhara, PS- Bellar, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Shri Chandra Bhushan Prasad. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the IPC.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and in sum and substance, the allegation is that brother of the petitioner, namely, Mithun, was caught as he had gone to centre to appear in an examination on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner was given the benefit of Section 41A of the Cr.P.C and he cooperated with the police during the course of investigation and the police never

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72060 of 2025(2) dt.11-11-2025 2/2 felt the need of arresting the petitioner, but then charge-sheet came to be submitted based on which cognizance has been taken, thus petitioner apprehends his arrest. It is further submitted that when police during the course of investigation never felt the need of arresting the petitioner, whether it would be prudent for the Court to send the petitioner to jail based on the fact that charge-sheet came to be submitted. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 755 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T