Ravindra Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72208 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2021 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Ravindra Chaudhary S/o Doodhnath Chaudhary R/v- Hiratola, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur 2.

Munni Devi W/o Ravindra Chaudhary R/v- Hiratola, P.S.- Piro, DistrictBhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Gulab Chand Chaudhary S/O Late Radha Chaudhary R/v- Kasap, P.S.- Kasap, P.S.- Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Shantam Shivam, Advocate For the Opposite Parties :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking regular bail in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 377 of 2021 / Sessions Trial No. 281 of 2022 registered for the offences under Sections 304(b) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the nature of allegations leveled against the petitioners and also the fact that they have no criminal antecedent, and in-as-much as petitioners are in custody since 18.04.2022. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above-named, be released on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72208 of 2022(2) dt.04-03-2023 2/2 bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, Ara at Bhojpur in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 377 of 2021 (Sessions Trial No. 281 of 2022), subject to the condition that the petitioners would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In the event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order including cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners.

It is clarified that if the charge has already been framed in the case, the bail bond of the petitioners shall be accepted by the court below.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Harsh/ U