Md Irfan Alam @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75779 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9576 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Md Irfan Alam @ Sonu S/O Md. Shabbir Alam @ Sabir Alam R/O Jalal Colony, Sohnipatti, Near Gauri Shankar Temple, Renter In House Of Md. Nasim, Ps. Town Ps., Dist. Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sahjadi Praveen W/O Md. Irfan Alam, D/O Md. Abdul Hakim Village- Naya Tola, Husanabad, Ps. Masaudhi, Dist. At Present Pethiya Bazar, Ps. Phulwari Sharif, Dist. Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for complainant/ opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498(A), 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for both the parties submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and both parties have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75779 of 2023(6) dt.25-09-2024 2/3 agreed to live separately and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 5,70,000/- (Rupees five lacs seventy thousand), as full and final settlement amount in easy installment and opposite party no. 2 accepted the offer and gave her consent.

4. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.

5. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.

6. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 9576 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75779 of 2023(6) dt.25-09-2024 3/3 Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, learned Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T