Ganesh Kumar @ Ganesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77935 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2023 Thana- KIUL RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Ganesh Kumar @ Ganesh Ram Son of Ramchandra Ram @ Bhakku Ram Resident of Vill- Brindavan,P.S.- Kiul, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 17 of 2024 arising out of Rail Kiul P.S. Case No. 71 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 302 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier vide order dated 18-122023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 65177 of 2023, bail of the petitioner was rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 3.

As per prosecution case, accusation against the petitioner that he has committed murder of the informant's nephew by means of knife blow due to which he sustained injury and in hospital doctor declared him dead. 4.

Earlier a report was called from the trial court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77935 of 2024(3) dt.27-01-2025 2/2 it is reported out of seven charge sheet witnesses, one witness is examined and trial would be concluded at least within a period of one year.

5.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court does not find any fresh ground to reconsider the matter, which is already decided on merit. The Court would further take note of the fact that petitioner is in custody since 02-05-2023. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no fresh ground to reconsider the matter as also the report of the trial court, this Court is not inclined to take a different view of the matter. Prayer for grant of bail is accordingly rejected.

7.

However, petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T