Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60839/2017bail granted

Parwez Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-18Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60839 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -621 Year- 2017 Thana -ARARIA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Parwez Alam, S/o Late Quddus, R/o Village- Bajrangi Tola, Ward no.17, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Naushad Uzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 03.09.2017 in connection with Araria P.S. Case No.621 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 153A, 295A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Bihar Preservation and Improvement of Animal Act, 1955.

Considering the fact that the petitioner's case stands on similar footing to that of one Md. Islam and Md. Jawed, who have been granted regular bail by this Court in Cr.Misc. No.62893 of 2017, vide order dated 12.01.2018, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60839 of 2017 (3) dt.18-01-2018 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Araria P.S. Case No.621 of 2017, subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of offence in future, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T