Baijnath Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76658 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-454 Year-2020 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Baijnath Manjhi S/O Late Chalitar Manjhi R/vill- Mohabbatpur, P.S.- Sherghati, Distt- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rahul Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 454 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The petitioner is alleged to be the assailant of the deceased and is said to have shot him, resulting in his death. The trial has commenced, and some witnesses have already been examined.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. Petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2024. He further submits that the witnesses who have been examined, have not supported
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76658 of 2025(3) dt.24-03-2026 2/2 the prosecution case and therefore, the petitioner may be granted bail.
5. The learned counsel for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that the allegations against the petitioner are serious and grave in nature. It is contended that prima facie there is sufficient material against the petitioner indicating his involvement in the commission of the offence.
6. Considering the fact that the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased and in light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of X vs State of Rajasthan & Anr, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3539, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T