← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71504/2025bail granted

Abhinay Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-13Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71504 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2025 Thana- PATEPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1 .

Abhinay Rai S/o- Tapeshwar Rai Vill- Bardiha Turki, P.S.- Patepur, DistrictVaishali 2.

Vinay Rai S/o- Tapeshwar Rai Vill- Bardiha Turki, P.S.- Patepur, DistrictVaishali 3 .

Sajan Rai S/o- Naresh Rai Vill- Bardiha Turki, P.S.- Patepur, DistrictVaishali 4.

Dhiraj Rai S/o- Naresh Rai Vill- Bardiha Turki, P.S.- Patepur, DistrictVaishali 5 .

Guddu Rai @ Guddu Kumar S/o- Amresh Rai Vill- Bardiha Turki, P.S.- Patepur, District- Vaishali 6.

Gautam Kumar S/o- Amresh Rai Vill- Bardiha Turki, P.S.- Patepur, DistrictVaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State .

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191 ( 2 ), 190, 127 ( 2 ), 115 ( 2 ), 109, 329 (3) , 352 and 351 ( 2 ) of the BNS.

3 . As per the prosecution case , informant namely , Mahdendra Ray alleged that on 10.06.2025 at about 01:00 PM,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71504 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/3 all the 30 F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioners armed with lathi, danda , farsa and iron rod, abused and assaulted informant due to which he sustained injury .

4. Learned counsel for petitioners contended that both the parties are co-villagers and land dispute is going on since long between the parties. Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. As per F.I.R. all the 30 named accused persons assaulted informant but as per injury report, informant sustained only one injury which itself falsifies the entire prosecution . Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5 . Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition .

6 Considering the general and omnibus allegation of assault against these petitioners, clean antecedent and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2025 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71504 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 3/3 Sanhita ( BNSS) , 2023 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T