← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71377/2025bail granted

Gaurabh Kumar Singh @ Gaurab Kumar @ Gaurab Kumar Singh @ Gaurab v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-28Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71377 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2023 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Gaurabh Kumar Singh @ Gaurab Kumar @ Gaurab Kumar Singh @ Gaurab S/o Vinay Singh R/o Village- Madhurapur, Ward No. 26, P.S.- Teghra in the district of Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with S.Tr.No. 107/2025 arising out of Teghrha P.S. Case No. 273/2023 dated 12.09.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have murdered the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner who is the husband of the deceased. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71377 of 2025(2) dt.28-11-2025 2/2 tortured the deceased. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 03.04.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. Earlier the regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this court vide order dated 10.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 61096/2024.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Begusarai in connection with S.Tr.No. 107/2025 arising out of Teghrha P.S. Case No. 273/2023, with the condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T