Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76593 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2023 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Pappu Kumar Son Of Ambika Rajvanshi Resident Of Village- Hemjabhart, Ps- Sirdalla, Distt- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 01-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 353, 448, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is case of the prosecution that on 27.04.2023 at 8:00AM petitioner entered into class VIII of the school and brutally assaulted a student of class VIII, namely, Ritu Kumar to which information has been given to local police. It is further alleged that after sometime petitioner again came into school and started abusing and brick-batting and assaulted a teacher of the school namely, Rajesh Kumar Bharti on his head with stone and took away register of the school.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76593 of 2023(2) dt.01-12-2023 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner is the neighbour of the school building. He further submitted that the injury sustained by this petitioner is simple in nature, in support of this annexure-2 has been annexed with this petition. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 22.06.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.-1st Class, Nawada in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 174 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T