Md. Monawwar Quraishi @ Mohamad Monabar Quereshi v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63016 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -356 Year- 2016 Thana -JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictJEHANABAD ====================================================== MD.

MONAWWAR QURAISHI @ MOHAMAD MONABAR QUERESHI, Son of Sanaur Quraishi, Resident of Mohalla- Khodanagar, P.S.- Chhatauni, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Khusboo Pravin, Daughter of Md. Qasim Quraishi, Resident of Village- Garhariya Khand, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Nityanand, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The languishing in custody since 15.09.2017 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63016 of 2017 (2) dt.05-01-2018 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Jehanabad, in connection with Trial No. 1225 of 2017, arising out of Complaint Case No.356 (C) of 2016.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T