Patna High CourtCWJC/18686/2017disposed

Shiv Bhushan Kumar Upadhyay And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-21Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18686 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Shiv Bhushan Kumar Upadhyay, Son of Kameshwar Upadhyay, Working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Middle School Ganghar Block Kutumba, P.S. Amba, District-Aurangabad.

2. Narendra Pathak, Son of Brajbilash Pathak, Working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Primary School, Sarsa Sarsi, Block Kutumba, P.S. Amba, District Aurangabad.

3. Abirendra Upadhyay, Son of Achutanand Upadhyay, Working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Middle School Niranjanpur, Block Kutumba, P.S. Amba, District Aurangabad.

4. Satish Narayan Mishra, Son of Tulshidutta Mishra, Working as an Assistant Teacher in Primary School, Gurgaya, Block Deo, P.O. Gurgaya Karma, P.S. Deo,District Aurangabad.

5. Vijay Kumar, Son of Ram Swarup Das, Working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Primary School, Sponvarsa, Block Kutumba, P.S. Amba, District Aurangabad.

6. Dilip Kumar, Son of Ram Prasad Singh, Working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Middle School, Chandaut, Block Kutumba, P.S. Amba, District Aurangabad.

7. Ajay Kumar Singh, Son of Baidhnath Prasad Singh, Working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. M/s Bijauli Deo Block Deo, District Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of BIhar, Patna.

2. The Distict Education Officer, Aurangabad.

3. The District Programme Office, (Establishment) Aurangabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur -Gp27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 21-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is covered by the decision of this court contained in

Patna High Court CWJC No.18686 of 2017 (2) dt.21-12-2017 2/2 Annexures-1 and 2.

In view of the submission of the counsel for the petitioners that the case of the petitioners is similar to the case of the petitioners of C.W.J.C. Nos. 6139 of 2007 and 14670 of 2014 contained in Annexure-1 and 2, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent nos.2 and 3 i.e. the District Education Officer and District Programme Officer (establishment), Aurangabad to examine the case of the petitioners and if the case of the petitioners is found similar to the case of the petitioners of C.W.J.C. Nos. 6139 of 2017 and 14670 of 2014 similar treatment should be extended to the petitioners of this case also. Such exercise must be completed within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U