Nageshwar Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40426 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2018 Thana -BIDUPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Nageshwar Rai, Son of Late Lala Rai,

2. Arun Rai,

3. Amod Rai @ Amod Kumar,

4. Binod Rai, All sons of Nageshwar Rai, All resident of VillageKalyanpur, Police Station- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bidupur P.S.Case No. 32 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against one co-accused is that he kidnapped the daughter of the informant and petitioners are father and brothers of the said co-accused Pappu Rai and allegation against them is of assault the girl and the girl is traceless. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the main accused is Pappu Rai, who fled away with the girl in Guahati and there was love affairs between them.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40426 of 2018 (2) dt.12-07-2018 2/2 Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order and on their so surrendering they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIV, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Bidupur P.S.Case No. 32 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned and further condition is that petitioners have to cooperate in investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required, otherwise their bail bonds shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U