Kare Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72730 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Madhepura ====================================================== KARE SINGH SON OF CHAMRU SINGH @ CHAMRU MANDAL R/O VILLAGE- CHHOTKI BADNONA (CHOTKI BADHAUNA), WARD NO.06, P.S.- CHOUSA, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pawan Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bishweshwar Ram, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. Altogether 17 litres of illegal country made liquor was recovered from the courtyard of the house of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern either with the seized liquor or any trade of liquor. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72730 of 2022(2) dt.21-03-2023 2/2 general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of his enemy. He was not apprehended on the spot. He had not consumed liquor. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, as the illicit liquor has been recovered from the courtyard of the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T