Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3658 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16954 of 2010 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Yadav, S/O Sri Banke Lal Rai, R/O Vill- Jogiraha, P.S.Kesaria, Distt-East Champaran(Motihari) .... ................................................... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, East Champaran (Motihari) through its Member.
4. The District Magistrate, East Champaran (Motihari).
5. The District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran (Motihari).
6. The Block Development Officer, Block-Kesarai, Distt-East Champaran (Motihari).
7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block-Kesarai, Distt-East Champaran (Motihari).
8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Bathna, Block-Kesaria, Distt-East Champaran (Motihari).
9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bathna, Block-Kesaria, Distt-East Champaran (Motihari).
10. Sri Arjun Prasad Yadav, S/O Sri Bhola Rai, R/O Vill Jagiraha, P.S.Kesaria, Distt-East Champaran (Motihari).
..........Opposite parties.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Smt. Shilpa Singh, G.A. 12. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
The present application has been filed for modification of order dated 04.07.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 16954 of 2010 by which the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority,
Patna High Court MJC No.3658 of 2017 (5) dt.05-09-2018 2/2 within a period of thirty days from the date of order i.e., 04.07.2017.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to mistake, he could not prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority. Hence, he prays for further thirty days time to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.
Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, the petitioner is granted further thirty days time to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority from today. The order dated 04.07.2017, passed in C. W. J. C. No. 16954 of 2010, stands modified to the extent as indicated above. The modification application is, accordingly, allowed. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U