Ajay Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40980 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -99 Year- 2018 Thana -NARHAT District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Ajay Kumar, S/o Late Kailu Singh,

2. Chhotu Kumar @ Anish Kumar S/o Bhola Singh, Both R/o Vill.- Sohwajpur, P.S.- Sitamarhi (Narhat Distt.- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Narhat (Sitamarhi) P.S. Case No. 99 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 504, 506, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioners are that they have assaulted the informant and his family members. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is case and counter case filed by the petitioners. It has further been submitted that injuries have been received both sides. It has also submitted that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioners.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40980 of 2018 (2) dt.17-07-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M-V, Nawada, in connection with Narhat (Sitamarhi) P.S. Case No. 99 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/-Amjad U T