← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/21633/2019dismissed

Kapildev Bhedihar @ Kapildeo Raut @ Kapildeo Raut Bhedihar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-02Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21633 of 2019 ====================================================== Kapildev Bhedihar @ Kapildeo Raut @ Kapildeo Raut Bhedihar, Son of late Nathuni Raut @ Late Nathuni Raut Bhedihar, Resident of VillageSenuwariya, P.S. Kangali, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah.

2.

The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 3.

The Superintendent of Police, Bettiah, West Champaran. 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bettiah Sadar, Bettiah, West Champaran. 5.

The Incharge Officer-Cum-Deputy Collector, Zila Samanya Shakha, Bettiah, West Champaran.

6.

The Circle Officer, Sikta Block, Sikta, District- West Champaran. 7.

The Officer in Charge, Kangali Police Station, Kangali, District- West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-07-2025 Heard the parties.

2. It has been apprised to this Court that the issue raised before this Court was duly considered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in Devmuni Paswan v. The State of Bihar & Ors. [2023(2) PLJR 425], wherein the declaration of Clause 5(7) of the Bihar Chaukidari Cadre (Amendment) Rules, 2014 held ultra vires and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The challenge to the decision rendered by the learned Division Bench has also failed before

Patna High Court CWJC No.21633 of 2019(4) dt.02-07-2025 2/2 the Apex Court.

3. In view of the aforesaid fact, no relief could be granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed.

(Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U