← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19247/2017disposed

Amresh Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-12Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19247 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Amresh Kumar, Son of Late Ganesh Dutt Singh, Resident of VillageSariya, P.S.- Janipur, District- Patna.

2. Manjay Kumar, Son of Late Mahendra Singh, Resident of VillageMaranchi, P.S.- Punpun, District- Patna.

3. Bijay Kumar Gupta, Son of Late Rajballabh Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village- Raja Bigha, P.S.- Dhanarua, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Main Secretariat, Patna.

2. Principal Secretary, Departmet of Finance, Main Secretariat, Patna.

3. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Main Secretariat, Patna.

4. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kishore Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mr. Braj Kishore Singh, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Anuradha Singh-SC21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts of the present case is identical to the case of Letters Patent Appeal No. 167 of 2016 (Avinash Kumar Chakerworty & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case.

In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of

Patna High Court CWJC No.19247 of 2017 (3) dt.12-09-2018 2 /2 petitioner and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny U