Rameshwar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4139 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15634 of 2016 ====================================================== Rameshwar Prasad Singh S/o Shri Baldev Singh R/o Village- Nav Ratanpur, Post- Postal Park, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Dist.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.
Deepak Kumar Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.
Amir Subhani the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.
Mithilesh Mishra the I.G. (Prison), Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5.
Jawahar Lal Prabhakar the Superintendent, Adarsh Central Jail, Beur, Patna 6.
Revindra Kumar Chaudhary The Superintendent, Central jail, Motihari ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma (Aag 3) Ms. Divya Verma, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2025 This contempt application has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 14.12.2018 passed in CWJC No. 15634 of 2016 wherein this Court had passed the following order:- "...Let the I.G. (Prison), Bihar, Patna, should consider the case of the petitioner in terms of the order passed in CWJC No. 16376 of 2011 disposed of on 18.05.2012. The authority will take a decision by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law..."
Patna High Court MJC No.4139 of 2019(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2
2. Opposite party Nos. 1-6 have filed a show-cause. Opposite Party No. 4 is stated to be I.G.(Prison). In paragraph No. 12 of the show-cause filed by the opposite party Nos. 1-6, it has been stated as under:- "...That taking into account all the facts mentioned above and the materials available on record, the Department in compliance with the order of the Hon'ble Court dated 14.12.2018 passed in CWJC No.
15634 of 2016 passed the reasoned order vide Memo No. 687 dated 24.01.2020 rejecting the claim of the petitioner..."
3. A copy of the order dated 24.01.2020 has also been enclosed as Annexure-B to the show-cause.
4. On perusal of the show-cause filed by the opposite party Nos. 1-6 and the Annexure-B of the show-cause, I find that the order dated 14.12.2018 passed in CWJC No. 15634 of 2016 has been complied with by the respondents.
5. Accordingly, this contempt application stands closed and disposed off.
(Nani Tagia, J) Nishant/- U