Patna High CourtCWJC/1113/2018disposed

Shiv Prakash Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-19The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1113 of 2018 ====================================================== Shiv Prakash Rai, son of Late Nageshwar Rai, R/o- Mohalla- Gali No. 2, Dobhighat Charitarwan, Buxar, P.S. Buxar, District- Buxar, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Director General, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate Ms. Ritika Rani, Advocate Ms. Kumari Neha, Advocate Mr. Vijay Kumar Vimal, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 19-01-2018 From the averments made in the writ petition, it is clear that the Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department and the Principal Secretary, Health Department are already seized of the issue in question and, therefore, at this stage it is not necessary for us to make any indulgence in this Public Interest Litigation, as petitioner's own showing goes to show that he has made a complaint in this regard to these authorities and that is why we say that the matter is pending before them. These authorities are directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take

Patna High Court CWJC No.1113 of 2018 dt.19-01-2018 2/2 such action as may be permissible in law within a reasonable period and thereafter in case petitioner has any grievance, he may ventilate it afresh in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) P.K.P./- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 24.01.2018 Transmission Date