Pravej Ansari @ Md Pravej Ansari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45996 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -134 Year- 2017 Thana -KURTHA District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. PRAVEJ ANSARI @ MD PRAVEJ ANSARI, Son of Shamsullah Ansari @ Md. Shamshu Ansari.

2. Nargish Khatoon D/o Shamsullah Ansari @ Md. Shamshu Ansari.

3. Khurshid Ansari @ Md. Khurshid Ansari, S/o Shamsullah Ansari @ Md. Shamshu Ansari.

4. Saidun Khatoon, W/o Shamsullah Ansari @ Md. Shamshu Ansari. All resident of Village- Kurthadih, P.S.- Kurtha, Distt.- Arwal. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Kurtha P.S.Case No. 134 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant with iron rod, causing injury on the head and other parts of body and also assaulted the wife of the informant with lathi and danda and petitioner Nos. 2 and 4 snatched her golden ear ring and mangalsutra. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45996 of 2018 (2) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 injuries found on the person of the informant and his wife, are simple in nature and not on the vital part of the body and allegation of snatching gold is ornamental in nature. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal in connection with Kurtha P.S.Case No.134 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T