Patna High CourtCR. WJC/714/2017dismissed

Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And O

2019-06-11Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.714 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2016 Thana- AIRPORT District- Patna ====================================================== Ashok Kumar, son of Late Rameshwar Prasad, resident of village : Adampur, P.S.: Khagaul, District: Patna, at present at CMD Lord Ashoka Home Graphic Infracom Pvt. Ltd. Shanti Market, Jagdeo Path, PS.: Hawai Adda, District:Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. The Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna

5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sachivalaya, Patna

7. The Officer-in-charge, Hawai Adda, P.S. District: Patna

8. Sahdeo Singh, son of Late Dwarika Singh, Director, Brajmohan Developers Pvt. Ltd., Salempur Dumra, P.S.: Hawai Adda, District: Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-06-2019 Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared on behalf of the State. The sole petitioner, who is arrayed as one of the accused in the F.I.R., has prayed for quashing of the F.I.R. Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner though had not put signature on the agreement he has falsely been implicated in the F.I.R. Fact remains that F.I.R. i.e. Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 82 of 2016 was registered on 13.06.2016 and petitioner was

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.714 of 2017(2) dt.11-06-2019 2/2 arrayed as accused in the F.I.R. After going through the same, I am of opinion that it is not a case for exercising writ jurisdiction.

The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) praful/- U T