← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2222/2017dismissed

Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-15Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2222 of 2017 =================================================== Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Son of Late Madheshwar Singh, Resident of village - Hankar Tola, Post Office - Jitaura, Police Station Piro, District - Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram

4. The District Education officer, Rohtas at Sasaram

5. The District Programme officer ( Establishment ), Rohtas at Sasaram

6. The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Bikramganj, District - Rohtas.

.... .... Respondents.

================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Sheo Jee Mishra, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadav- GP23 : Ms. Meera Singh, AC to GP-23.

=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner had earlier preferred CWJC No. 5372 of 2015 which was dismissed on merit vide judgment dated 20.05.2015. However, petitioner has again filed this writ petition for directing the respondent authorities to provide regular pay scale to the petitioner as he was appointed Assistant Teacher on compassionate ground after death of his father who died in

Patna High Court CWJC No.2222 of 2017 dt.15-02-2017 harness who was drawing regular pay scale and not the contractual pay scale as existing for new entrants. In that writ petition also, the petitioner wanted correction in his appointment letter by which he was appointed as Assistant Teacher on contractual basis. As per Rule, 2014, by filing this writ petition, petitioner wants regular pay-scale and not the contractual one.

In my view, this writ petition would not be maintainable as the same is barred by principle of res judicata. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) Vikash/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 09.05.2017 Transmission Date NA