Puja Kumari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7605 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Puja Kumari D/o - Sri Sechu Sharma Resident of Village - Tiwai, P.S. - Chainpur, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua), Presently posted as Panchayat Teacher in Primary School Ansoga, Panchayat - Awarhiyan, Block - Durgawati, Dist - Kaimur.

2. Md. Farooque Ansari S/o Md. Eliyash Ansari Resident of Village - Kauchadi, P.S. and Block - Bhagwanpur, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua) Presently posted as Panchayat Teacher in Primary School - Machakhiyan, Panchayat - Awarhiyan, Block - Durgawati, Dist - Kaimur.

3. Soni Khatoon D/o Aftab Alam Khan Resident of Village and P.S. - Bhabua, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua) presently posted as Panchayat Teacher in Primary School - Dhannipur, Panchayat - Awarhiyan, Block - Durgawati, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua).

4. Seema Kumari D/o Gulab Singh Resident of Ward No. 11, Bhabua, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua) Presently posted as Panchayat Teacher in Primary School Janardanpur, Panchayat - Awarhiyan, Block - Durgawati, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabhua) .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Director, Primary Education, H.R.D., Patna, Bihar.

3. The District Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua).

4. The District Education Officer, Kaimur (Bhabua).

5. The District Program Officer (Establishment), Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua).

6. The Block Education Officer, Block - Durgawati, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua).

7. The Block Development Officer, Block - Durgawati, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua).

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Awarhiyan, Block - Durgawati, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua).

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Awarhiyan, Block - Durgawati, Dist - Kaimur (Bhabua) .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Bijay Shankar Choubey, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, AC to GP XX ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 15-02-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the State.

Learned counsel appearing for the State with reference to paragraph 9 of the counter affidavit submits that the respondents are taking steps for redressal of the grievance of the petitioners. Paragraph 9 of the counter affidavit is as follows : "9 : That in view of the matter the petitioner will be

Patna High Court CWJC No.7605 of 2017 (3) dt.15-02-2018 2/2 paid within a period of two months after completing all necessary formalities."

In view of the specific stand, the writ petition is disposed of on the undertaking of the respondents, contained in paragraph 9 quoted here-in-above.

In case the petitioners have any further grievance after the payment as assured in paragraph 9, liberty shall be available to the petitioners to file representation before the respondent no. 5 to raise the grievance with regard to error in calculation or if the petitioners is not satisfied with the payment made by the respondents on account of the fact that any of the entitlement has not been addressed. In case any representation is filed within a period of one month from the date of payment, respondent no. 5 shall be under obligation to dispose of the representation in accordance with law within two months of filing representation and any further due is found to be given to the petitioners it shall be paid within a further period of two months from the date of such decision.

With the aforesaid observations, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) SA/- U