Ram Pukar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75765 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Ram Pukar Ram, Son of Late Buchun Ram, Resident of Village - Sekhdiha, P.S. - Uteri, District - Palamu (Jharkhand) 2.

Chanda Devi,Wife of Ram Pukar Ram Resident of Village - Sekhdiha, P.S. - Uteri, District - Palamu (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the informant is also present.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No.247 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 is the Bhaisur and petitioner No.2 is his wife (Gotani). Learned counsel submits that these petitioners have been falsely implicated in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75765 of 2019(3) dt.09-12-2019 2/3 the present case and have nothing to do with any active torture and have disassociated with themselves in any dispute which is within the family of his younger brother and his wife. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these petitioners will co-operate in whatever investigation and shall present themselves as and when required during the course of trial.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, however, submits that there is specific allegation against these petitioners that they had also attacked the informant and, therefore, they should not be extended the privilege of anticipatory bail.

However, considering the entire facts and circumstances and the nature of allegations, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No.247 of 2018, subject to the conditions

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75765 of 2019(3) dt.09-12-2019 3/3 as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T