Patna High CourtCWJC/10228/2017disposed

Anil Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-08The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10228 of 2017 ====================================================== Anil Kumar Paswan, S/o Rajendra Paswan, Resident of Village- Tilaiya Brindawan, P.S.- Chouparan, District- Hazaribagh. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate-cum- Collector, Gaya.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Gaya.

5. The Inspector, Excise, Sherghati Area, Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. VIVEK PRASAD -GP7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 08-11-2017 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle 'Bolero' bearing Registration No. JH02AK-6352, which has been seized in connection with Excise Case No.190 of 2017 due to violation of the Excise Act. The prayer made in the writ petition is to release the vehicle in question pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case. It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in

Patna High Court CWJC No.10228 of 2017(2) dt.08-11-2017 2/2 the present case.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the aforesaid confiscation proceedings and criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing two surety bonds to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Gaya and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the District Magistrate, Gaya and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U