Patna High CourtCWJC/3690/2017disposed

Arun Kumar Akela v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-09-07Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3690 of 2017 =========================================================== Arun Kumar Akela, S/o Sri Ravindra Sharma, Resident of Village-Pokhwan, P.O.- Pandaul, P.S.-Sakuraabd, District-Jehanabad. BIhar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director General of Police Govt. of Bihar Patna.

3. The Inspector General of Police Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Region, at Patna, Bihar

5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna, Bihar. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 07-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Advocate General for the State.

2. The petitioner was aggrieved by his order of suspension. However, today it has been informed that final order has been passed in the departmental proceeding by which certain punishment has been imposed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the final order has been passed in the departmental proceeding, but in view of there being no order/clarification with regard to the status of the petitioner relating to him being under suspension, a follow-up or consequential order is required to be passed.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3690 of 2017 dt.07-09-2017 2 / 2

4. Learned Advocate General submitted that the final order passed in the departmental proceeding is supposed to supersede all previous orders and but naturally, suspension order also stands merged with the same. However, he submitted that consequential order, as may be required, shall be issued within 10 days.

5. In view of the clear-cut stand taken by learned Advocate General, the writ petition stands disposed off.

6. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to assail the order of punishment inflicted on him, in accordance with law, before the appropriate forum.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U