Chandrama Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75226 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2025 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna ====================================================== Chandrama Devi W/o- Dayanand Singh Resident of village-Dharampur PSAthmalgola Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was apprehended in a tempo and from her possession, a bag was recovered and from that bag, altogether 8.25 kg of ganja like intoxicating substance was recovered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is simply a traveller of that tempo and she has been framed by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75226 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 police. Nothing has been recovered from her possession. It has also been submitted that petitioner is a lady. The quantity of contraband which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. From perusal of the FIR, it is clear that it is only the perception of the police that the said contraband was ganja. The raiding party was not having any kit to test the contraband. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 06.07.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 236 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge (NDPS), Patna.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T