Kalawati Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44249 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.C.ase No. -77 Year- 2018 Thana -RIVILGANJ District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Kalawati Devi wife of Krishna Sah, resident of Village- Sirisia, Police Station- Revelganj, District- Saran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.
The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Revelganj P.S. Case No. 77/2018, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. She has no concern with the affairs of the deceased and her husband. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Revelganj P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44249 of 2018 (2) dt.25-07-2018 2/2 77/2018, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIIIth, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T